The Kingdom of God by John Bright Book Review
Run into a Problem?
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Customs Reviews
Always since, I accept seen that theme more and more throughout the pages of the prophets and the psalms, the patriarchs and the judges, the gospels and the epistles. And notwithstanding, I accept hea
Sometimes, you get to read a book that you lot feel like yous've been looking for your whole life. Nigh x years ago, reading the Divine Conspiracy (Dallas Willard) was that book for me. It introduced me to a line of thinking ("The kingdom is at paw") that had not previously struck me as being and then prominent in the Bible.E'er since, I take seen that theme more and more than throughout the pages of the prophets and the psalms, the patriarchs and the judges, the gospels and the epistles. And nevertheless, I have heard it preached and so rarely, that I wondered if my understanding was but too juvenile for the supremacy of the individual conservancy arc. Was the "kingdom of God" concept of less import than the idea that we are saved by Christ's death?
This volume, the second one which felt, from page one, like I had been looking for it my whole life, helped me address that nagging question.
I have frequently thought that our western mode of thinking leads united states to elevator up the thought of individual conservancy higher up all other concepts. A country in which private rights are the prime value is going to tend to lean in the direction of theology that reflects that individualistic bent.
And while the "kingdom of God" equally a primary emphasis does not diminish the value of Christ'southward sacrifice–in fact, it hinges on that very aforementioned sacrificial deed– it does diminish the thought that Christ's principal goal was perhaps not my salvation (the individualistic theology). Not that He does not want me with Him, but that His wanting me has less to do with my value to Him and more to do with God's Kingdom, a kingdom for which the people of God have always truly longed, since the offset covenant, where He called His children to exist His children, and He promised He would be their God.
In beautiful, haunting, moving, and compelling prose, John Bright, constrained only past the occasional anachronistic reference to Marxist Russia, presents a timeless argument that His Story is not almost saving me, only about building His Kingdom. This is how my story becomes worth anything, to submit this life, as lilliputian, fragile, and sinful as it is, to the lordship of His Kingdom, the one that is at hand, that is already and not yet, that is forever and e'er.
And one more matter. Please read this book.
...more thanWithal, the book disappoints in the last few chapters when Bright begins discussing the kingdom of God in New Attestation. It is not that I don't agree with him in his decision t
John Vivid's writing way is interesting and blithe, which makes this volume an piece of cake page turner. Near of the book is an first-class assay of Israel's history and the progress of State of israel's understanding of the kingdom of God. I plant this very helpful and well thought through. For this solitary it is well worth the read.Nevertheless, the volume disappoints in the last few chapters when Bright begins discussing the kingdom of God in New Testament. It is non that I don't concord with him in his determination that the kingdom of God is "already" and "not yet": his discussion of the tension between the kingdom already come and the kingdom still coming is undoubtedly first-class. Merely it is that Brilliant wholly sidesteps the issue of the land of Israel, not fifty-fifty mentioning it, as if information technology was a non-issue. This is remarkable because the entire Old Testament is building upwardly this theme, only for Bright it falls flat in the New Testament. This is a colossal oversight (or better, error) made by many Christian scholars. We fail to come across the significance of the land of Israel, equally well as the kingly motif of the son of David, fifty-fifty though the land and the coming king is writ large all over the Scriptures!
In the latter part of the book Bright too repeatedly uses the unBiblical and almost blasphemous (though certainly unintentional) phrase "new Israel", even though the Bible never in one case uses this phrase and never conceives the Church building of Christ as the "new Israel". In fact Bright contradicts himself, for in the course of the volume he explains how the Church saw itself as the righteous remnant Within Israel (a point well made). Here was an unfortunate and sloppy oversight.
The bug with Vivid's volume are similar to the problems with Graeme Goldsworthy'south book "Gospel and Kingdom", written on the aforementioned subject. Both authors practise a masterful job of analyzing the Erstwhile Testament and tracing the concept of the kingdom of God in Israel's thinking. Their books are pure gold on this signal. But then when they both get to the New Testament everything changes and they absolutely fail to connect the dynamic theme, which they had and then wonderfully been following in the Old Testament, with the New Attestation. Everything falls flat; concepts are redefined; and we are left with an entirely dissimilar conception in the New Testament than what nosotros were getting so excited about in the Quondam Attestation. In my opinion this is due to a sloppy Christian systematic way of thinking that gets forced upon the New Testament. This way of thinking doesn't know how to connect with Israel's historical hope. The result is a very Gentilish and not-Biblical idea of the kingdom which is foreign to the Biblical authors themselves. What amazes me virtually of all is how Christian scholars tin can brand this jarring maneuver without hardly noticing nor even making mention of the land of Israel and the son of David, those enormous Quondam Testament themes they discard.
Nonetheless the book is total of priceless gems and insights and is greatly worth reading. I only promise to help future readings of this book (and other books on the same subject) to notice the glaring omissions made by many Christian scholars, and to take special care in seeing the continuity between both Testaments. The lack that exists in Christian scholarship on this point needs serious remedy.
...moreSpecifically demonstrating how the many fine historical, cultural, literary, and theological details of the Old Testament weave this theme together and and so proceed transitioning to how Jesus fulfills this theme in the New Testament is quite some other.
John Vivid manages to do this with great thoughtfulness and care. While he brings the Quondam Testament's narrative and theology to l
Stating the "Kingdom of God" is not only the good news Jesus preached, but also the Bible's overall theme is one thing.Specifically demonstrating how the many fine historical, cultural, literary, and theological details of the Old Testament weave this theme together and and then continue transitioning to how Jesus fulfills this theme in the New Attestation is quite some other.
John Bright manages to do this with great thoughtfulness and care. While he brings the Old Attestation's narrative and theology to life in a detailed manner some may call back tedious, information technology doesn't necessarily have to be seen that way. The content he shares is indispensable and would greatly benefit any Christian by connecting the Bible story'south dots in means they've never known. For anyone who has ever flipped through the pages of the Bible while wondering why and how it matters (peculiarly the Major/Pocket-sized Prophet literature), this book provides that much needed insight.
He demonstrates how God'south promise to Abram to make his descendants into a cracking people through whom the globe will come to be blest finds the start of its fulfillment in the covenant God fabricated with Israel to make them into a "kingdom of priests". He recounts how their failure to keep that covenant and its mission incited God'due south hope to establish his righteousness and rule through a servant whose suffering and sacrifice would ordain a new covenant his true kingdom people would embody. In addition, past focusing on the intertestamental flow of post-exile, the Hellenization of the world, the Jews' emphasis and fencing of the Constabulary, the Maccabean revolt, and the subsequent Roman occupation, he sheds much needed lite on that so-chosen "silent period" to bear witness how God was withal working His volition inside often ignored historical moments to gear up the context of the Messiah's eventual appearing. His splendid give-and-take of Jesus' ministry is mostly spent examining how the Church building's mission, as God's Kingdom people, is to proclaim and embody his rule and righteousness every bit both a nowadays and eschatological promise.
If any drawback to the volume could be named, it would exist that Vivid doesn't spend much time discussing precisely how the Church is supposed to practise that, save for "Be the Church", which he acknowledges is playing with words. That can exist forgiven, however, since Bright'southward purpose here is just to offering a detailed overview clarifying the Bible'southward overall theme. How we might specifically "Be the Church building" is a claiming Brilliant leaves with the reader to discern through Scriptural-shaped convictions how to answer Christ's call to embody the life of the Kingdom citizen.
One aspect that continually amused me throughout the book was that, despite beingness first published in 1953, much of what he wrote seems as pertinent today as it did and so. Regardless of how archaic we deem it, history still keeps coming back effectually. While that may be a point of dread for many, for those who might understand how Christ's Kingdom rule is God's consummating volition moving with and towards history, that may indeed exist good news.
...moreJust what exactly does this mean? Two issues. Firstly does that mean the whole Onetime Testament is just incorrect and therefore a waste of fourth dimension - clearly non sustainable in whatever Christian sense. Clearly other images of what the Kingdom means are also relevant. Secondly Bright never really can pivot down what that suffering retainer actually means for individual or church - is he really simply pointing to a new morality as encapsulated in Jesus' Sermon on the Mount? Yet this pedagogy of Jesus is not the whole of scripture either, having nix almost salvation/redemption in this early part of Jesus' ministry building.
The pitiful matter is that Vivid in this volume truly seems to be seeking a deeper truth of what it means to exist a sanctified Christian (if it is advisable to apply that term), merely it is all about 'the man' and nothing most a living God. God has no part except as a distant guiding low-cal. This is perhaps the mainstream/institution position of the era, coming before God became real, personable and we started to speak of 'a relationship with God' in the Billy Graham revival and charismatic renewal movements just about to break forth. It is kind of pitiful that the subsequently editions of worthwhile and thoughtful search might not take been able to say, 'aha, merely of course it doesn't depend on united states changing merely on Christ living in u.s.' or something of that sort.
There is still a good amount of value to what is said here, however it does experience that the mode here is a transcript of a series of spoken sermons (of that era besides!), rather than written text. At that place is a vast deviation between proficient spoken English and written English language and this book actually does not read well at all. Also it is rather too credible how Bright fawns over his academic mentor, William Albright
...moreAll in all, this is an fantabulous read and a corking expect at a
John Brilliant gives a compelling caption of the Kingdom of God. Through a comprehensive biblical theology he explains the role of both Israel and the Church in that kingdom. I thought his piece of work in the Old Testament was excellent, while his piece of work in the New Attestation was good just not equally thorough as his handling of the Erstwhile. He deals more with the issues of the church non truly existence the church in the end than with New Testament texts.All in all, this is an excellent read and a peachy look at a Biblical theology of the Kingdom of God. I would recommend this to all Christians for a practiced understanding of this topic.
...more thanArchetype!
News & Interviews
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign y'all in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/867762
0 Response to "The Kingdom of God by John Bright Book Review"
Postar um comentário